Skip to content

Conversation

@adrianosela
Copy link
Contributor

@adrianosela adrianosela commented Nov 28, 2024

[ME-3787] Move Connector Stats Message

Made a mistake in previous PR.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new request type for statistics in the Control Stream, enhancing request handling capabilities.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Removed statistics from Control Stream responses, streamlining response structures for clients.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new stats property in the Border0_V1_ControlStreamRequest struct, allowing it to handle statistics messages. This addition is reflected in the updated OneOf_RequestType enum. Conversely, the stats property is removed from the Border0_V1_ControlStreamResponse struct, indicating that responses will no longer include statistics. The encoding and decoding logic for the request has been updated to accommodate the new message type, enhancing request handling while altering the response structure.

Changes

File Change Summary
connector/connector.pb.swift - Added var stats: Border0_Common_V1_StatsMessage in Border0_V1_ControlStreamRequest struct.
- Added case stats(Border0_Common_V1_StatsMessage) in OneOf_RequestType enum of ControlStreamRequest.
- Removed case stats(Border0_Common_V1_StatsMessage) from OneOf_RequestType enum of ControlStreamResponse.
connector/connector.proto - Added border0.common.v1.StatsMessage stats = 17; in ControlStreamRequest message.
- Removed border0.common.v1.StatsMessage stats = 17; from ControlStreamResponse message.

Possibly related PRs

  • ME-3787: device stats #41: The addition of the stats property of type Border0_Common_V1_StatsMessage in the Border0_Device_V1_DeviceToServerMessage struct is related to the main PR's introduction of the stats property in Border0_V1_ControlStreamRequest, as both involve handling statistics messages.
  • [ME-3787] Device Stats Messages Changes #42: The changes in Border0_Common_V1_StatsMessage and the addition of the stats property in Border0_V1_ControlStreamResponse are directly related, as both PRs enhance the handling of statistics messages in different contexts of the protocol.

Suggested reviewers

  • pedroandrade
  • waltzofpearls
  • th3wingman
  • btoonk

🐇 "In the stream where data flows,
A new stat's here, as everyone knows.
Requests now carry a message bright,
While responses bid stats goodnight.
Hop along, let’s celebrate,
For changes here are truly great!" 🥕

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure.

🔧 buf (1.47.2)
connector/connector.proto

Config file YAML parsing error: yaml: unmarshal errors:
line 1: cannot unmarshal !!str lint:{u... into bufconfig.externalFileVersion. Please check your buf configuration file for YAML syntax errors.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
connector/connector.proto (1)

35-35: Consider documenting the breaking change.

The movement of StatsMessage from responses to requests is a breaking change that requires coordination between client and server updates.

Consider adding a comment above the field to document:

  1. When this change was made
  2. Why stats were moved from response to request
  3. Migration considerations for clients
+    // Stats field moved from ControlStreamResponse to ControlStreamRequest in PR #43
+    // to transition from pull-based to push-based stats reporting
     border0.common.v1.StatsMessage stats = 17;
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 559e74d and 4b6e313.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • connector/connector.pb.go is excluded by !**/*.pb.go
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • connector/connector.pb.swift (5 hunks)
  • connector/connector.proto (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
connector/connector.proto (1)

35-35: Verify the architectural implications of moving stats to requests.

The addition of StatsMessage to ControlStreamRequest suggests a shift in the stats reporting architecture from a pull model (server requesting stats) to a push model (client sending stats). This is a breaking change that affects the API contract.

Consider the following implications:

  1. Clients must be updated to proactively send stats
  2. Servers must be updated to handle stats in requests instead of sending stats requests
  3. Migration strategy might be needed for backward compatibility

Let's verify the complete removal of stats from responses and check for any remaining references:

✅ Verification successful

Breaking change confirmed: Stats field moved from response to request

The verification confirms that:

  1. The StatsMessage field has been completely removed from ControlStreamResponse
  2. The field is now only present in ControlStreamRequest with field number 17
  3. The change represents a complete architectural shift from pull to push model for stats reporting

This is indeed a breaking change that requires careful coordination between client and server updates. The removal from response and addition to request is clean, with no lingering references to stats in the response message.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the complete removal of stats handling from responses
# and check for any remaining references that might need updating

# Check for any remaining stats references in proto files
rg -i "stats.*message" --type proto

# Check for any response-related stats handling in the codebase
rg -i "stats.*response" --type proto

Length of output: 136


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach without relying on file type detection

# Check for any stats-related messages in proto files
fd '\.proto$' --exec rg -i 'stats.*message' {}

# Check for any response-related stats handling
fd '\.proto$' --exec rg -i 'stats.*response' {}

# Get the full context of the connector.proto file to verify the changes
fd 'connector\.proto$' --exec cat {}

Length of output: 7115

connector/connector.pb.swift (5)

195-201: LGTM: Stats property implementation follows the established pattern.

The implementation of the stats property correctly follows the getter/setter pattern used for other oneof fields in the struct.


221-221: LGTM: Stats case properly added to OneOf_RequestType enum.

The new case follows the established pattern and is correctly associated with the Border0_Common_V1_StatsMessage type.


1365-1377: LGTM: Stats decoding logic properly implemented.

The decoding implementation for the stats field follows the established pattern and correctly handles the oneof field semantics.


1449-1452: LGTM: Stats traversal logic properly implemented.

The traversal implementation for the stats field follows the established pattern and correctly handles the oneof field semantics.


195-201: Verify the complete migration of stats message.

While the addition of the stats field to the request type is properly implemented, let's verify that it has been completely removed from the response type as intended.

Also applies to: 221-221, 1365-1377, 1449-1452

✅ Verification successful

The previous search might have been too specific. Let's broaden our search to understand both the stats message implementation and response type structures to verify the migration.


Stats message has been properly migrated

Based on the search results, I can confirm that:

  1. The stats message is correctly implemented in the request type (Border0_V1_ControlStreamResponse.OneOf_RequestType)
  2. There are no references to stats in the response type or its variants
  3. The complete enumeration of response types shows no stats-related fields

The migration appears to be complete and correct.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to stats in the response messages
# This will help confirm the complete migration of the stats message

# Search for stats-related fields in response messages
rg -i 'stats.*response' --type swift

Length of output: 38


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to find any stats-related code in the protobuf file
rg -A 5 -B 5 "stats" connector/connector.pb.swift

# Also search for response type definitions to understand the structure
rg -A 5 "Response" connector/connector.pb.swift

Length of output: 13929

@adrianosela adrianosela merged commit 9286a1b into main Nov 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants