Add default WAF filter for lightfuzz

[liquidsec]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

📊 Performance Benchmark Report

Comparing dev (baseline) vs lightfuzz-performance (current)

📈 Detailed Results (All Benchmarks)

📋 Complete results for all benchmarks - includes both significant and insignificant changes

🧪 Test Name	📏 Base	📏 Current	📈 Change	🎯 Status
Bloom Filter Dns Mutation Tracking Performance	4.22ms	4.22ms	+0.0% ⚪	✅
Bloom Filter Large Scale Dns Brute Force	17.87ms	17.90ms	+0.2% ⚪	✅
Large Closest Match Lookup	350.77ms	360.08ms	+2.7% ⚪	✅
Realistic Closest Match Workload	191.07ms	192.22ms	+0.6% ⚪	✅
Event Validation Full Scan Startup Small Batch	432.55ms	447.49ms	+3.5% ⚪	✅
Event Validation Full Scan Startup Large Batch	772.56ms	779.77ms	+0.9% ⚪	✅
Make Event Autodetection Small	31.11ms	30.75ms	-1.2% ⚪	✅
Make Event Autodetection Large	315.27ms	317.54ms	+0.7% ⚪	✅
Make Event Explicit Types	13.82ms	13.90ms	+0.5% ⚪	✅
Excavate Single Thread Small	3.992s	4.003s	+0.3% ⚪	✅
Excavate Single Thread Large	9.278s	9.311s	+0.3% ⚪	✅
Excavate Parallel Tasks Small	4.110s	4.171s	+1.5% ⚪	✅
Excavate Parallel Tasks Large	7.145s	7.175s	+0.4% ⚪	✅
Is Ip Performance	3.15ms	3.19ms	+1.3% ⚪	✅
Make Ip Type Performance	11.30ms	11.63ms	+3.0% ⚪	✅
Mixed Ip Operations	4.42ms	4.51ms	+2.0% ⚪	✅
Typical Queue Shuffle	61.78µs	62.07µs	+0.5% ⚪	✅
Priority Queue Shuffle	707.53µs	716.45µs	+1.3% ⚪	✅

🎯 Performance Summary

✅ No significant performance changes detected (all changes <10%)

---

🐍 Python Version 3.11.13

[TheTechromancer]

If we need to track which cloud providers are WAFs, this should be done in cloudcheck

[liquidsec]

is that possible now or do we want to hold for a cloudcheck feature?

[TheTechromancer]

Cloudcheck is about to get rustified so now is a good time to add it

[liquidsec]

you ok with going ahead with this temporarily until that's done?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92%. Comparing base (212be84) to head (dcb404a).
⚠️ Report is 100 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##             dev   #2712    +/-   ##
======================================
- Coverage     92%     92%    -0%     
======================================
  Files        410     407     -3     
  Lines      33942   33826   -116     
======================================
- Hits       31007   30865   -142     
- Misses      2935    2961    +26     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.