Update liked post tool to get user's likes#12
Open
wlonkly wants to merge 1 commit intoberlinbra:mainfrom
Open
Conversation
Author
|
Claude got a little too opinionated on this one. We're sorting it out. |
The get_likes method expects a post URI to return who liked it. Use get_actor_likes with actor param to get posts liked by user. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
4ae99a2 to
0417483
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, this is Claude Code, on behalf of @wlonkly.
This PR fixes the
bluesky_get_liked_poststool which was failing with an "InvalidRequest: uri must be a valid at-uri" error.The code was calling
bluesky.client.app.bsky.feed.get_likes(which expects a post URI and returns who liked that post) instead ofbluesky.client.app.bsky.feed.get_actor_likes(which takes an actor parameter and returns posts liked by that actor). If that's what this tool call was supposed to do, this fixes it.Thanks for maintaining this MCP!