Merged
Conversation
…sn't provide any more context, so it's silenced.
…t might need it for debug purposes.
Contributor
Author
|
I don't think the CI failure is caused by this PR ( |
freakboy3742
previously requested changes
Oct 20, 2025
Member
freakboy3742
left a comment
freakboy3742
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've flagged a handful of cases where chaining isn't providing any additional context; with those cleaned up this should be good to land.
mhsmith
approved these changes
Oct 20, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolve ruff rule B904 - raise-without-from-inside-except.
This PR build on the stale PR #2476 by @cgkoutzigiannis. It only contains a rebase and adds 235dd9b, which addresses the changes requested by @mhsmith. See #2476 for related comments.
Fixes #2381.
Closes #2476.
PR Checklist: