fix(elasticache): the default engine for NoPasswordUser contradict in the docs #35920
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue # (if applicable)
Closes #35847
Reason for this change
NoPasswordUseronly supports the Redis engine, but the documentation incorrectly states that the default engine isVALKEY, creating a contradiction between the implementation and documentation. SinceNoPasswordUseronly works with Redis, theengineproperty should not be configurable for this user type.Description of changes
NoPasswordUser.IamUserPropsandPasswordUserProps).Describe any new or updated permissions being added
No new or updated IAM permissions are being added with these changes.
Description of how you validated changes
engineproperty inNoPasswordUsertestsChecklist
BREAKING CHANGE: The
engineproperty inNoPasswordUserPropshas been removed.By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license