Skip to content

UPSTREAM PR #18653: CANN: support gated linear attn#838

Open
loci-dev wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
upstream-PR18653-branch_hipudding-gla
Open

UPSTREAM PR #18653: CANN: support gated linear attn#838
loci-dev wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
upstream-PR18653-branch_hipudding-gla

Conversation

@loci-dev
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@loci-dev loci-dev commented Jan 7, 2026

Mirrored from ggml-org/llama.cpp#18653

This change adds support for the GGML_OP_GATED_LINEAR_ATTN operator. The feature was implemented by YushengZhao(#17814). Because the previous submission was based on an outdated codebase, this PR was rebased to merge.

Make sure to read the contributing guidelines before submitting a PR

@loci-review
Copy link
Copy Markdown

loci-review bot commented Jan 7, 2026

Explore the complete analysis inside the Version Insights

I've successfully generated the summary report for your project. Here are the key findings:

Summary Report for llama.cpp PR #838

Project Information:

Performance Analysis Results:

The analysis shows that this pull request has minimal performance impact:

  • Response Time: No modified functions showed performance changes greater than 2%
  • Throughput Time: No modified functions showed performance changes greater than 2%

Conclusion:

This PR is performance-neutral, meaning:

  • No significant performance regressions were detected
  • No significant performance improvements were detected
  • The changes likely focus on functionality, bug fixes, or code quality improvements rather than performance optimization
  • Importantly, no measurable performance degradation was introduced

This is a positive result indicating that the changes can be merged without concerns about performance impact.

@loci-dev loci-dev force-pushed the upstream-PR18653-branch_hipudding-gla branch from c457528 to 746a693 Compare January 7, 2026 08:44
@loci-review
Copy link
Copy Markdown

loci-review bot commented Jan 7, 2026

Explore the complete analysis inside the Version Insights

Perfect! I've generated the summary report for your project. Here's what the analysis shows:

Summary Report for llama.cpp PR #838

Key Finding:No Significant Performance Impact Detected

The performance analysis comparing the base version to the target version found that:

What this means:

  • No performance regressions were introduced
  • The code changes maintain performance stability
  • The PR likely focuses on functionality, bug fixes, or code quality improvements rather than performance optimization
  • Safe to proceed without performance concerns

The analysis was conducted for the auroralabs-loci/llama.cpp repository, comparing version 36a12d81-eba1-11f0-81f2-dbb430499cb5 (base) against version 95bb1651-eba6-11f0-81f2-dbb430499cb5 (target).

@loci-dev loci-dev force-pushed the main branch 24 times, most recently from 8e2d6b7 to 6e24171 Compare January 10, 2026 11:08
@loci-dev loci-dev force-pushed the main branch 23 times, most recently from bbbac3d to 5194aba Compare January 15, 2026 20:10
赵禹昇 and others added 3 commits January 16, 2026 06:10
This change adds support for the GGML_OP_GATED_LINEAR_ATTN operator.
The feature was implemented by YushengZhao. Because the previous
submission was based on an outdated codebase, this PR was rebased to
merge.

Co-authored-by: YushengZhao <yusheng.chao@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: hipudding <huafengchun@gmail.com>
Optimize gla for high preformance
@loci-dev loci-dev force-pushed the upstream-PR18653-branch_hipudding-gla branch from 746a693 to bfa67a8 Compare January 16, 2026 07:38
@loci-review
Copy link
Copy Markdown

loci-review bot commented Jan 16, 2026

Explore the complete analysis inside the Version Insights

Based on the analysis, no functions were identified with measurable performance changes between the base and target versions. This indicates no meaningful performance impact from the code changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants