-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
feat: keep backwards compatibility with SSL_CERT_FILE without requiring --native-tls
#2401
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
charliermarsh
merged 4 commits into
astral-sh:main
from
samypr100:backwards-compat-ssl-cert-file
Mar 13, 2024
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we instead change
tls::loadto add a certificate based onSSL_CERT_FILE? I think we would just callroot_cert_store.addwith the result of this: https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/2351/files#diff-dcc1f69d132524500a0dcf217aa6db521517536daaf9364f3085961626fe722cR120There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was thinking more towards delegating the parsing of
SSL_CERT_FILEto rustls-native-certs as we already do when we combine (--native-tlswithSSL_CERT_FILE).The
SSL_CERT_FILEis actually a CA bundle, meaning it can contain more than one cert. I believe we'd have to load each entry, get a vector of Certificates, and them add them to the builder one by one and handle potential incompatible cert errors along the way (we get this for free with rustls-native-certs).I did see an API reqwest to load a pem bundle, but didn't see one to add them all at once, so we'd need to call
add_root_certificatefor each one in a loop as we build client.Sidenote, I've just tested this current PR with creating my own self-signed CA's and set
SSL_CERT_FILEto this and can confirm this solution would effectively delegate the parsing ofSSL_CERT_FILEtorustls-native-certsproperly (as we already do with the combination of--native-tlswithSSL_CERT_FILE)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we're concerned with a user providing an invalid
SSL_CERT_FILEpath, how about a nice warning?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that seems reasonable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added in 85d92e8