Avoid if-else simplification for TYPE_CHECKING blocks
#8072
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
Author
|
We can merge this, but I should audit the other |
Contributor
PR Check ResultsEcosystemℹ️ ecosystem check detected changes. (+0, -1, 0 error(s)) airflow (+0, -1)
- airflow/models/xcom.py:875:1: SIM108 Use ternary operator `XCom = BaseXCom if TYPE_CHECKING else resolve_xcom_backend()` instead of `if`-`else`-block
|
charliermarsh
force-pushed
the
charlie/SIM108
branch
from
05d64d5 to
9f2066a
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #8071.