Skip to content

Conversation

@charliermarsh
Copy link
Member

Summary

Closes #15292.

@charliermarsh charliermarsh added the rule Implementing or modifying a lint rule label Jan 7, 2025
@charliermarsh charliermarsh enabled auto-merge (squash) January 7, 2025 02:48
@charliermarsh charliermarsh merged commit 75a24bb into main Jan 7, 2025
20 checks passed
@charliermarsh charliermarsh deleted the charlie/stub branch January 7, 2025 02:51
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 7, 2025

ruff-ecosystem results

Linter (stable)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

Linter (preview)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

dcreager added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2025
* main:
  Use uv consistently throughout the documentation (#15302)
  [red-knot] Eagerly normalize `type[]` types (#15272)
  [`pyupgrade`] Split `UP007` to two individual rules for `Union` and `Optional` (`UP007`, `UP045`) (#15313)
  [red-knot] Improve symbol-lookup tracing (#14907)
  [red-knot] improve type shrinking coverage in red-knot property tests (#15297)
  [`flake8-return`] Recognize functions returning `Never` as non-returning (`RET503`) (#15298)
  [`flake8-bugbear`] Implement `class-as-data-structure` (`B903`) (#9601)
  Avoid treating newline-separated sections as sub-sections (#15311)
  Remove call when removing final argument from `format` (#15309)
  Don't enforce `object-without-hash-method` in stubs (#15310)
  Don't special-case class instances in binary expression inference (#15161)
  Upgrade zizmor to the latest version in CI (#15300)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

rule Implementing or modifying a lint rule

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Should eq-without-hash (PLW1641) not apply to stubs?

2 participants