Issue-2734 - Clamp buffer to maximum upon large write operation#2745
Merged
Lukasa merged 18 commits intoSep 18, 2024
Conversation
ali-ahsan-ali
commented
Jun 19, 2024
Contributor
Author
|
Addressing #2734 |
Lukasa
reviewed
Jun 20, 2024
Lukasa
requested changes
Jun 20, 2024
Contributor
Lukasa
left a comment
Lukasa
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for this! I've left a few notes in the diff.
FranzBusch
reviewed
Jun 24, 2024
FranzBusch
reviewed
Jun 26, 2024
ali-ahsan-ali
force-pushed
the
Issue-2734-shrink-buffer-after-write
branch
from
ebb1d9c to
825a6b3
Compare
FranzBusch
reviewed
Jul 10, 2024
Member
FranzBusch
left a comment
FranzBusch
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Except the doc nit this look good to me now. I would like @Lukasa to also take a look before merging.
Lukasa
reviewed
Jul 15, 2024
Lukasa
reviewed
Jul 22, 2024
ali-ahsan-ali
force-pushed
the
Issue-2734-shrink-buffer-after-write
branch
from
c64d301 to
180b41f
Compare
ali-ahsan-ali
force-pushed
the
Issue-2734-shrink-buffer-after-write
branch
from
180b41f to
a48b322
Compare
ali-ahsan-ali
force-pushed
the
Issue-2734-shrink-buffer-after-write
branch
from
3c4c678 to
3da1d3a
Compare
weissi
requested changes
Aug 9, 2024
Member
weissi
left a comment
weissi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey, thanks for the patch. I think I found a UB issue and I'm not sure if the reader/writerIndices are handled correctly either
ali-ahsan-ali
commented
Aug 10, 2024
Contributor
Author
|
Hey @weissi LMK when you find time to take a look at this. No rush! |
weissi
reviewed
Sep 10, 2024
Member
Commented, looks 99% complete, just three small things |
Contributor
Author
|
Will cry tears of joy once this gets merged 👍 |
Lukasa
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2024
Contributor
Lukasa
left a comment
Lukasa
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Very nice, thank you very much for your hard work and persistence with this!
ali-ahsan-ali
commented
Sep 17, 2024
auto-merge was automatically disabled
September 17, 2024 02:03
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
cgrindel-self-hosted-renovate Bot
referenced
this pull request
in cgrindel/rules_swift_package_manager
Sep 25, 2024
This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Update | Change | |---|---|---| | [apple/swift-nio](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio) | minor | `2.72.0` -> `2.73.0` | --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>apple/swift-nio (apple/swift-nio)</summary> ### [`v2.73.0`](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/releases/tag/2.73.0) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/compare/2.72.0...2.73.0) <!-- Release notes generated using configuration in .github/release.yml at main --> #### What's Changed ##### SemVer Minor - Make `ByteBuffer`'s description more useful by [@​supersonicbyte](https://redirect.github.com/supersonicbyte) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2864](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2864) - Expose `UDP_MAX_SEGMENTS` via System by [@​rnro](https://redirect.github.com/rnro) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2891](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2891) - Add new `ChannelOption` to get the amount of buffered outbound data in the Channel by [@​johnnzhou](https://redirect.github.com/johnnzhou) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2849](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2849) - Add an `AcceptBackoffHandler` to the async server bootstraps by [@​FranzBusch](https://redirect.github.com/FranzBusch) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2782](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2782) ##### SemVer Patch - Adding a nicer description for `WebSocketFrame` by [@​supersonicbyte](https://redirect.github.com/supersonicbyte) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2862](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2862) - Improving `description` and adding `debugDescription` to `NIOAny` by [@​supersonicbyte](https://redirect.github.com/supersonicbyte) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2866](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2866) - Make FileChunk sendable by [@​ali-ahsan-ali](https://redirect.github.com/ali-ahsan-ali) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2871](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2871) - Make `ByteBuffer.debugDescription` suitable for structural display by [@​dnadoba](https://redirect.github.com/dnadoba) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2495](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2495) - Add support for WASILibc by [@​MaxDesiatov](https://redirect.github.com/MaxDesiatov) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2671](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2671) - `NIOSingleStepByteToMessageDecoder` reentrancy safety by [@​rnro](https://redirect.github.com/rnro) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2881](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2881) - Adopt `NIOThrowingAsyncSequenceProducer` by [@​rnro](https://redirect.github.com/rnro) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2879](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2879) - Clamp buffer to maximum upon large write operation by [@​ali-ahsan-ali](https://redirect.github.com/ali-ahsan-ali) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2745](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2745) - Revert "Adopt `NIOThrowingAsyncSequenceProducer` ([#​2879](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/issues/2879))" by [@​rnro](https://redirect.github.com/rnro) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2892](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2892) - Add concrete description for `EmbeddedEventLoop` by [@​aryan-25](https://redirect.github.com/aryan-25) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2890](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2890) - Conditionally include linux/udp.h by [@​rnro](https://redirect.github.com/rnro) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2894](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2894) - Work around a type checking error when using the Static Linux SDK by [@​euanh](https://redirect.github.com/euanh) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2898](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2898) ##### Other Changes - \[CI] Run tests on push to main by [@​FranzBusch](https://redirect.github.com/FranzBusch) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2868](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2868) - \[CI] License header support `.in` and `.cmake` files by [@​FranzBusch](https://redirect.github.com/FranzBusch) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2870](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2870) - Include nanoseconds in assertion of timestamp for NIOFileSystem tests by [@​gjcairo](https://redirect.github.com/gjcairo) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2869](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2869) - Correct the link of sswg-security at SECURITY.md by [@​lamtrinhdev](https://redirect.github.com/lamtrinhdev) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2872](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2872) - Speculative fix for flakey AsyncTestingEventLoop test by [@​simonjbeaumont](https://redirect.github.com/simonjbeaumont) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2873](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2873) - ci: Install shellcheck if not present in CI runner by [@​simonjbeaumont](https://redirect.github.com/simonjbeaumont) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2882](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2882) - ci: Use ${GITHUB_BASE_REF} as treeish for checking API break by [@​simonjbeaumont](https://redirect.github.com/simonjbeaumont) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2883](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2883) - ci: Refer to nested reusable workflows using remote variant by [@​simonjbeaumont](https://redirect.github.com/simonjbeaumont) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2884](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2884) - \[CI] Fix pull request label workflow by [@​FranzBusch](https://redirect.github.com/FranzBusch) in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2885](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2885) #### New Contributors - [@​ali-ahsan-ali](https://redirect.github.com/ali-ahsan-ali) made their first contribution in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2871](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2871) - [@​aryan-25](https://redirect.github.com/aryan-25) made their first contribution in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2890](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2890) - [@​johnnzhou](https://redirect.github.com/johnnzhou) made their first contribution in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2849](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2849) - [@​euanh](https://redirect.github.com/euanh) made their first contribution in [https://github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2898](https://redirect.github.com/apple/swift-nio/pull/2898) **Full Changelog**: apple/swift-nio@2.72.0...2.73.0 </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Enabled. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 👻 **Immortal**: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get [config help](https://redirect.github.com/renovatebot/renovate/discussions) if that's undesired. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box --- This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://redirect.github.com/renovatebot/renovate). <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzOC45NC4xIiwidXBkYXRlZEluVmVyIjoiMzguOTQuMSIsInRhcmdldEJyYW5jaCI6Im1haW4iLCJsYWJlbHMiOltdfQ==--> Co-authored-by: cgrindel-self-hosted-renovate[bot] <139595543+cgrindel-self-hosted-renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Open
1 task
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix Issue 2734 by clamping storage size after large write operation
Motivation:
Fix Issue 2734
Modifications:
Result:
Once a write message that is larger than the capacity of the MessageToByteHandler's maxBufferCapacity, it clamps the byteBuffer down.