Skip to content

Conversation

@Mantisus
Copy link
Collaborator

@Mantisus Mantisus commented Jul 9, 2025

Description

  • Makes the read method for HttpResponse asynchronous. This is more consistent in a fully asynchronous framework. More flexible than a synchronous method

@Mantisus Mantisus changed the title refactor! change method read for Response from sync to async refactor!: Change method read for Response from sync to async Jul 9, 2025
@Mantisus Mantisus requested a review from vdusek July 9, 2025 13:38
Copy link
Collaborator

@vdusek vdusek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That makes sense, thanks, just please describe it in the upgrading guide 🙂.

@Mantisus Mantisus changed the title refactor!: Change method read for Response from sync to async refactor!: Change method read for HttpResponse from sync to async Jul 9, 2025
@Mantisus Mantisus requested a review from vdusek July 9, 2025 19:49
@Mantisus Mantisus self-assigned this Jul 10, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@vdusek vdusek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@vdusek vdusek changed the title refactor!: Change method read for HttpResponse from sync to async refactor!: Change method HttpResponse.read from sync to async Jul 10, 2025
@vdusek vdusek merged commit 83fa8a4 into apify:master Jul 10, 2025
20 checks passed
@vdusek vdusek added this to the 118th sprint - Tooling team milestone Jul 10, 2025
@vdusek vdusek added t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team. enhancement New feature or request. labels Jul 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request. t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants