[SPARK-34566][LAUNCHER] Fix configuration typo of spark. launcher.childConnectionTimeout #31678
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
@HyukjinKwon @dongjoon-hyun @maropu A configuration typo, I think it's wroth to raise a minor PR. |
|
Test build #135549 has finished for PR 31678 at commit
|
maropu
reviewed
Feb 28, 2021
| * when using @link{#start()}. | ||
| */ | ||
| public static final String CHILD_CONNECTION_TIMEOUT = "spark.launcher.childConectionTimeout"; | ||
| public static final String CHILD_CONNECTION_TIMEOUT = "spark.launcher.childConnectionTimeout"; |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmmmm OK I will close this one.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix typo if
spark. launcher .childConnectionTimeoutWhy are the changes needed?
Fix configuration type
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
Not need