Skip to content

[SPARK-32230][R][INFRA] Use Hadoop 2.7 profile in AppVeyor SparkR build #29040

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
HyukjinKwon wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[SPARK-32230][R][INFRA] Use Hadoop 2.7 profile in AppVeyor SparkR build #29040

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion appveyor.yml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ build_script:
# '-Djna.nosys=true' is required to avoid kernel32.dll load failure.
# See SPARK-28759.
# Ideally we should check the tests related to Hive in SparkR as well (SPARK-31745).
- cmd: mvn -DskipTests -Psparkr -Djna.nosys=true package
- cmd: mvn -DskipTests -Phadoop-2.7 -Psparkr -Djna.nosys=true package
Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun Jul 8, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we upgrade to @steveloughran 's Hadoop 3.0 instead of using Hadoop 2.7.1 here?

# ========================== Hadoop bin package
# This must match the version at https://github.com/steveloughran/winutils/tree/master/hadoop-2.7.1
$hadoopVer = "2.7.1"

He already provides Hadoop 3 also.

Copy link
Member Author

@HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon Jul 8, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, sure. Let me try!

Copy link
Member Author

@HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon Jul 8, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I made a separate PR for that #29042. If that passes the tests, we can merge that one and close this.


environment:
NOT_CRAN: true
Expand Down