Skip to content

Conversation

@srowen
Copy link
Member

@srowen srowen commented Nov 17, 2018

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Make SparkHadoopUtil private to Spark

How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

@srowen
Copy link
Member Author

srowen commented Nov 17, 2018

CC @vanzin . I took the liberty of simplifying a few other bits of the file too.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 17, 2018

Test build #98949 has finished for PR 23066 at commit 5a79b2e.

  • This patch fails due to an unknown error code, -9.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 17, 2018

Test build #4428 has finished for PR 23066 at commit 5a79b2e.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 17, 2018

Test build #4431 has finished for PR 23066 at commit 5a79b2e.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@srowen
Copy link
Member Author

srowen commented Nov 19, 2018

Merged to master

@srowen srowen closed this Nov 19, 2018
@srowen srowen deleted the SPARK-26043 branch November 19, 2018 15:17
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2018
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Make SparkHadoopUtil private to Spark

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Closes #23066 from srowen/SPARK-26043.

Authored-by: Sean Owen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <[email protected]>
jackylee-ch pushed a commit to jackylee-ch/spark that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2019
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Make SparkHadoopUtil private to Spark

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Closes apache#23066 from srowen/SPARK-26043.

Authored-by: Sean Owen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <[email protected]>
@mdianjun
Copy link

@srowen Our app is using the SparkHadoopUtils.addCredentials API to do this before using a custom datasource of ours and are now facing breaking changes. I don't see this mentioned anywhere in a migration guide or release notes.

@srowen
Copy link
Member Author

srowen commented Oct 25, 2020

The idea is that it was never meant for users (developer API) and wasn't easy to make stable. You can simply replicate its code in your code base; it's just a bit of helper code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants