-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-17914][SQL] Fix parsing of timestamp strings with nanoseconds #18252
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String | |
| * Helper functions for converting between internal and external date and time representations. | ||
| * Dates are exposed externally as java.sql.Date and are represented internally as the number of | ||
| * dates since the Unix epoch (1970-01-01). Timestamps are exposed externally as java.sql.Timestamp | ||
| * and are stored internally as longs, which are capable of storing timestamps with 100 nanosecond | ||
| * and are stored internally as longs, which are capable of storing timestamps with microsecond | ||
| * precision. | ||
| */ | ||
| object DateTimeUtils { | ||
|
|
@@ -399,13 +399,13 @@ object DateTimeUtils { | |
| digitsMilli += 1 | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (!justTime && isInvalidDate(segments(0), segments(1), segments(2))) { | ||
| return None | ||
| while (digitsMilli > 6) { | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. add a comment indicating we are truncating the nanosecond part and its lossy?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @wzhfy done |
||
| segments(6) /= 10 | ||
| digitsMilli -= 1 | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Instead of return None, we truncate the fractional seconds to prevent inserting NULL | ||
| if (segments(6) > 999999) { | ||
| segments(6) = segments(6).toString.take(6).toInt | ||
| if (!justTime && isInvalidDate(segments(0), segments(1), segments(2))) { | ||
| return None | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (segments(3) < 0 || segments(3) > 23 || segments(4) < 0 || segments(4) > 59 || | ||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
100 ns is different from micro, isn't it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, but the previous comment, which was introduced in this commit, was no longer correct. The logic was changed in this commit and now it is up to microseconds.