-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-20797][MLLIB]fix LocalLDAModel.save() bug. #18034
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The problem is that this writes multiple files. I don't think you can do that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why not? i think it does works. the multiple parquet files will may be in random order, but it will save topic indices. when u call load process, parquet will restore dataframe, u can check the LocalLDAModel's load method, it will scan all dataframe's row with the topic indices to rebuild the (topic x vocab) breeze matrix.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe the point of repartition(1) is to export this to a single file for external consumption. Of course writing it succeeds, but I don't think this is what it is intended to do.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've read mllib's online lda's code implements and the paper.
i found a simple way to test it , u can try this code snippet, simulation a matrix to save:
val vocabSize = 500000val k = 300val random = new Random()val topicsDenseMatrix = DenseMatrix.fill[Double](vocabSize, k)(random.nextDouble())There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@d0evi1 I'm not sure how that's related to my comment.
@hhbyyh what do you think -- am I wrong about the issue?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the PR is trying to do something similar to https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9989/files.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@srowen what's your concern with saving multiple files instead of one?
We've encountered crippling errors saving large LDA models in the ml api as well. The problem there is even worse, since the entire matrix is treated as one single datum
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add a testcase to save model into multiple files and load back and check the correctness ?