Skip to content

Conversation

@WangzJi
Copy link
Contributor

@WangzJi WangzJi commented Jan 5, 2026

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)?

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 5, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.39%. Comparing base (a1bb731) to head (4419898).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.x    #7915      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     71.74%   72.39%   +0.64%     
  Complexity      872      872              
============================================
  Files          1310     1310              
  Lines         49977    49977              
  Branches       5945     5945              
============================================
+ Hits          35856    36180     +324     
+ Misses        11160    10834     -326     
- Partials       2961     2963       +2     

see 18 files with indirect coverage changes

Impacted file tree graph

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@WangzJi WangzJi marked this pull request as draft January 5, 2026 08:19
@WangzJi WangzJi marked this pull request as ready for review January 5, 2026 10:03
@WangzJi WangzJi added the type: test test case label Jan 7, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

type: test test case

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant