-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
[HUDI-5147] Flink data skipping doesn't work when HepPlanner calls copy()… #7113
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fcf618a
[HUDI-5147] Flink data skipping doesn't work when HepPlanner calls co…
trushev 6f7af52
fix flink 1.13 incompatibility
trushev 806ea1b
[HUDI-5147] Fix bug when flink data skipping doesn't work due to HepP…
trushev aeabc3f
[HUDI-5147] Fix bug when flink data skipping doesn't work due to HepP…
trushev 7f6c959
trigger CI
trushev File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice catch ~ Should we also keep this method:
instance(Path path, Configuration conf, RowType rowType)?Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is a really good question
Quick answer -- yes we should keep because the method is used in
IncrementalInputSplitswithout filter at all.But why there is no a filter in
IncrementalInputSplits. Looks likeFileIndexis useless in this way. I mean data skipping feature skips nothingMb we should pass filters from
HoodieTableSourcehere:I think it is not part of this fix related to
copy()byHepPlannerWDYT about the separate ticket/PR for this problem if the one exists?:)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree, we can fix it in another PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And another solution is we add a
FileIndexparam in the constructor so that there is no need to re-construct it again and again.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, you are right
FileIndexparam in the constructorthis.filterswith local variable inapplyFilters(filters)List<ResolvedExpression> filtersas no need anymoreinstance(path, conf, rowType, filters)as no need anymore