-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.2k
YARN-6151. FS Preemption doesn't filter out queues which cannot be pr… #188
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -235,6 +235,29 @@ public void setFairSharePreemptionThreshold(float fairSharePreemptionThreshold) | |
| this.fairSharePreemptionThreshold = fairSharePreemptionThreshold; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Recursively check if the queue can be preempted based on whether the | ||
| * resource usage is greater than fair share. | ||
| * | ||
| * @return true if the queue can be preempted | ||
| */ | ||
| public boolean canBePreempted() { | ||
| assert parent != null; | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Why is this necessary? |
||
| if (parent.policy.checkIfUsageOverFairShare( | ||
| getResourceUsage(), getFairShare())) { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } else { | ||
| // recursively find one queue which can be preempted | ||
| for (FSQueue queue: getChildQueues()) { | ||
| if (queue.canBePreempted()) { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return false; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Recomputes the shares for all child queues and applications based on this | ||
| * queue's current share | ||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -2036,10 +2036,10 @@ public void testPreemptionIsNotDelayedToNextRound() throws Exception { | |
| .getLeafQueue("queueA.queueA2", false), clock.getTime()); | ||
| assertEquals(3277, toPreempt.getMemorySize()); | ||
|
|
||
| // verify if the 3 containers required by queueA2 are preempted in the same | ||
| // verify if the 4 containers required by queueA2 are preempted in the same | ||
| // round | ||
| scheduler.preemptResources(toPreempt); | ||
| assertEquals(3, scheduler.getSchedulerApp(app1).getPreemptionContainers() | ||
| assertEquals(4, scheduler.getSchedulerApp(app1).getPreemptionContainers() | ||
| .size()); | ||
| } | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Can we add a new test that verifies the exact scenario in the JIRA description? |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should the check of the allowPreemptionFrom flag also be part of this method?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It should be, but allowPreemptionFrom is introduced after 2.8.x.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aah, I keep forgetting branch-2.8 was cut years ago. :(