Remove grpc-status-details when no pb exists

[EarthChen]

What is the purpose of the change

Brief changelog

Verifying this change

Checklist

• Make sure there is a GitHub_issue field for the change (usually before you start working on it). Trivial changes like typos do not require a GitHub issue. Your pull request should address just this issue, without pulling in other changes - one PR resolves one issue.
• Each commit in the pull request should have a meaningful subject line and body.
• Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to understand what the pull request does, how, and why.
• Check if is necessary to patch to Dubbo 3 if you are work on Dubbo 2.7
• Write necessary unit-test to verify your logic correction, more mock a little better when cross module dependency exist. If the new feature or significant change is committed, please remember to add sample in dubbo samples project.
• Add some description to dubbo-website project if you are requesting to add a feature.
• GitHub Actions works fine on your own branch.
• If this contribution is large, please follow the Software Donation Guide.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #11249 (cc8e412) into 3.1 (c2eef7b) will decrease coverage by 5.16%.
The diff coverage is 18.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                3.1   #11249      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     69.62%   64.46%   -5.17%     
+ Complexity      114       14     -100     
============================================
  Files          1503     1422      -81     
  Lines         80063    59360   -20703     
  Branches      14135     8726    -5409     
============================================
- Hits          55745    38264   -17481     
+ Misses        19538    17029    -2509     
+ Partials       4780     4067     -713     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
.../apache/dubbo/rpc/protocol/tri/TripleProtocol.java	80.64% <ø> (-7.98%)	⬇️
...bo/rpc/protocol/tri/stream/TripleServerStream.java	34.97% <0.00%> (-15.33%)	⬇️
...bo/rpc/protocol/tri/stream/TripleClientStream.java	44.67% <9.75%> (-25.61%)	⬇️
.../dubbo/rpc/protocol/tri/stream/AbstractStream.java	80.00% <66.66%> (-20.00%)	⬇️
.../dubbo/rpc/protocol/tri/call/TripleClientCall.java	39.58% <100.00%> (-8.65%)	⬇️
...luster/router/script/ScriptStateRouterFactory.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
...he/dubbo/test/common/impl/GreetingServiceImpl.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
...zookeeper/curator/CuratorZookeeperTransporter.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
...nfigure/DubboRelaxedBinding2AutoConfiguration.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
.../apache/dubbo/test/spring/SpringXmlConfigTest.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-96.16%)	⬇️
... and 531 more

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[win120a]

Class.forName 用全限定名更合适吧，要不然 JVM 抛出的会是 NoClassDefFoundError。

（复现）
先编译下面两个类，然后删掉 X2.class，之后运行 X 类，发现输出的是 NoClassDefFoundError。

public class X {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        try {
            Class.forName(X2.class.getName());
        } catch (ClassNotFoundException cnfe) {
            System.out.println("ClassNotFoundException");
        } catch (NoClassDefFoundError ncdfe) {
            System.out.println("NoClassDefFoundError");
        }
    }
}

public class X2 {
    // 内容随便，有个类就行。
    public void m1() {
        System.out.println(Object.class.getName());
    }
}

[sonarqubecloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
4 Code Smells

25.0% Coverage
0.0% Duplication

[guohao]

LGTM