Fix record formatting in 1.58

[tustvold]

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #1177

Rationale for this change

Fixes failing tests

What changes are included in this PR?

There appears to have been a change in the debug formatting of floats in 1.58 that causes the debug output to change - in particular it prints in scientific notation where previously it did not. I can't find explicit mention of this in the release notes, but have confirmed it locally.

I've replicated the behavior tested by the tests, but I'm not entirely sure this is exactly what it would have previously output for all cases. The debug outputs are not stable.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1178 (2069358) into master (231cf78) will increase coverage by 0.07%.
The diff coverage is 92.30%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1178      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.59%   82.66%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         173      173              
  Lines       50919    50902      -17     
==========================================
+ Hits        42055    42077      +22     
+ Misses       8864     8825      -39     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
arrow/src/buffer/immutable.rs	98.92% <ø> (ø)
parquet/src/schema/printer.rs	72.47% <50.00%> (ø)
arrow/src/compute/kernels/arithmetic.rs	90.86% <73.33%> (+5.29%)	⬆️
arrow/src/util/test_util.rs	92.04% <100.00%> (ø)
parquet/src/arrow/levels.rs	84.28% <100.00%> (+1.40%)	⬆️
parquet/src/record/api.rs	91.65% <100.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
parquet_derive/src/parquet_field.rs	65.98% <0.00%> (-0.23%)	⬇️
arrow/src/array/builder.rs	86.62% <0.00%> (+0.11%)	⬆️
arrow/src/array/transform/mod.rs	85.56% <0.00%> (+0.13%)	⬆️
arrow/src/datatypes/datatype.rs	66.80% <0.00%> (+0.42%)	⬆️
... and 1 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f2d7a21...2069358. Read the comment docs.

[alamb]

Thanks @tustvold