-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
implement eq_dyn, neq_dyn, lt_dyn, lt_eq_dyn, gt_dyn, gt_eq_dyn for timestamp types #1095
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1095 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 82.31% 82.32% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 168 168
Lines 49420 49436 +16
==========================================
+ Hits 40679 40700 +21
+ Misses 8741 8736 -5
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
liukun4515
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
|
Thanks for review. Is this ready to go? |
alamb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @viirya
| /// `A_VEC` and `B_VEC` can be of type `Vec<i64>` or `Vec<Option<i64>>`. | ||
| /// `EXPECTED` can be either `Vec<bool>` or `Vec<Option<bool>>`. | ||
| /// The main reason for this macro is that inputs and outputs align nicely after `cargo fmt`. | ||
| macro_rules! cmp_i64 { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is a nice refactor
|
Thanks @alamb @jimexist @liukun4515 ! |
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #1086.
Rationale for this change
What changes are included in this PR?
Are there any user-facing changes?