Skip to content

v3.0: gossip: fix duplicate shred handler buffer pruning (backport of #9897)#9900

Merged
steviez merged 1 commit intov3.0from
mergify/bp/v3.0/pr-9897
Jan 10, 2026
Merged

v3.0: gossip: fix duplicate shred handler buffer pruning (backport of #9897)#9900
steviez merged 1 commit intov3.0from
mergify/bp/v3.0/pr-9897

Conversation

@mergify
Copy link

@mergify mergify bot commented Jan 10, 2026

Problem

Duplicate shred reassembly buffer cleanup procedure uses inappropriate threshold for cleanup heuristics

Summary of Changes

Fix the duplicate shred handler buffer pruning heuristics


This is an automatic backport of pull request #9897 done by Mergify.

Co-authored-by: Alex Pyattaev <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit d58c62c)
@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team as a code owner January 10, 2026 04:25
@steviez steviez requested a review from alexpyattaev January 10, 2026 04:26
Copy link

@alexpyattaev alexpyattaev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 83.4%. Comparing base (928f0cc) to head (0bda179).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             v3.0    #9900   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage    83.4%    83.4%           
=======================================
  Files         810      810           
  Lines      366361   366361           
=======================================
+ Hits       305802   305832   +30     
+ Misses      60559    60529   -30     
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@steviez steviez merged commit f4ac43d into v3.0 Jan 10, 2026
43 checks passed
@steviez steviez deleted the mergify/bp/v3.0/pr-9897 branch January 10, 2026 05:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants