Why such a restrictive license for a project that is meant to serve as an example?

[viperfx]

Hello Anthropic,

I am wondering why such a restrictive license was placed on the some of the skills (such as the document-skills folder)? If it's meant to serve as an example for the community to build upon. It also is quite poor taste to take open source libraries, add instructions and a few scripts and then add a restrictive license to it.

Since this project has been open sourced, there are many forks, but also copies of the skills into projects.

Can we get a clear answer from Anthropic around how the files in this repo can be used? can it be used for commercial projects, or open source projects?

[colbytimm]

Agree. This licensing seems totally unnecessary. @klazuka Are you able to provide insight here?

[RichieHakim]

I suspect people aren't seeing the LICENSE.md files here. They are egregiously scoped: no local copies, no modifications, no 'outside servies' like using with any other agentic framework. This should really be changed @klazuka .