fix: selection on non-interactive

[germa89]

Description

Fix not running xsel commands in non_interactive.

Issue linked

Close #3989

Checklist

• I have visited and read Develop PyMAPDL.
• I have tested my changes locally
• I have added necessary documentation or updated existing documentation.
• I have followed the PyMAPDL coding style guidelines.
• I have added appropriate unit tests that also ensure the minimal coverage criteria.
• I have reviewed my changes before submitting this pull request.
• I have linked the issue or issues that are solved to the PR if any.
• I have assigned this PR to myself.
• I have marked this PR as draft if it is not ready to be reviewed yet.
• I have made sure that the title of my PR follows Commit naming conventions (e.g. feat: adding new MAPDL command)

Summary by Sourcery

Fix selection commands not executing in non-interactive mode and update related tests.

Bug Fixes:

• Ensure inner_wrapper invokes selection functions in non-interactive sessions instead of returning early.

Tests:

• Rename multiline failure tests to distinguish between ValueError and DeprecationWarning.
• Add parameterized tests for node selection (nsel) behavior under non-interactive context for different selection types.

[ansys-reviewer-bot]

Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying:

@ansys-reviewer-bot review

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide

Restore command execution in non-interactive mode by modifying the inner_wrapper early return to call the wrapped function, and improve test coverage by renaming existing tests for clarity and adding a parameterized test for node selection under non-interactive conditions.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Execute commands in non-interactive mode by calling the wrapped function instead of returning early	Replaced silent return with return func(*args, **kwargs) when self._store_commands is True Ensures xsel (selection) commands run under non-interactive context	src/ansys/mapdl/core/mapdl_core.py
Refine and extend tests for multiline input and non-interactive selection	Renamed test_multiline_fail to test_multiline_fail_value_error to reflect ValueError expectation Renamed second test_multiline_fail to test_multiline_fail_deprecation_warning to capture deprecation warning Added test_selection_on_non_interactive parameterized over selection types (S,R,U,A) to validate node selection behavior under non-interactive mode	tests/test_mapdl.py

Assessment against linked issues

Issue	Objective	Addressed	Explanation
#3989	Fix the issue where selection commands (like nsel) do not work correctly within the non_interactive context.	✅

Possibly linked issues

• Selection doesn't work in non_interactive #3989: The PR modifies the core logic to ensure selection commands execute in non-interactive mode, fixing issue Selection doesn't work in non_interactive #3989.

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @germa89 - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

• Consider renaming _store_commands to something like _non_interactive_mode or _deferred_execution to better reflect its purpose and improve readability.
• Add analogous tests for other selection methods (e.g. esel, csel) to ensure this non‐interactive execution fix applies consistently across all *_sel commands.
• Ensure the non_interactive context manager fully restores the original interactive state on exit so that selection state doesn’t leak into subsequent operations.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.12%. Comparing base (44e4dee) to head (7830b78).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3998      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.11%   89.12%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         187      187              
  Lines       14970    14970              
==========================================
+ Hits        13340    13342       +2     
+ Misses       1630     1628       -2     

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[germa89]

@pyansys-ci-bot LGTM.

[pyansys-ci-bot]

✅ Approving this PR because germa89 said so in here 😬