test: improving testing performance

[germa89]

Description

As the title.

Issue linked

NA

Checklist

• I have visited and read Develop PyMAPDL.
• I have tested my changes locally
• I have added necessary documentation or updated existing documentation.
• I have followed the PyMAPDL coding style guidelines.
• I have added appropriate unit tests that also ensure the minimal coverage criteria.
• I have reviewed my changes before submitting this pull request.
• I have linked the issue or issues that are solved to the PR if any.
• I have assigned this PR to myself.
• I have marked this PR as draft if it is not ready to be reviewed yet.
• I have made sure that the title of my PR follows Commit naming conventions (e.g. feat: adding new MAPDL command)

[ansys-reviewer-bot]

Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying:

@ansys-reviewer-bot review

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.20%. Comparing base (a2f91e6) to head (8238ea8).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3703      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.88%   88.20%   +0.31%     
==========================================
  Files         187      187              
  Lines       14710    14712       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits        12928    12976      +48     
+ Misses       1782     1736      -46     

[germa89]

@pyansys-ci-bot LGTM.

[pyansys-ci-bot]

✅ Approving this PR because germa89 said so in here 😬

[germa89]

It seems that requires_package is very slow:

[germa89]

I see that raising and handling exceptions can be quite costly.

For instance, when having exceptions while logging during exiting, the traceback can take up to 10s?!?!