Bump RDMA memory check UCX version

[ovidiusm]

What?

Bump RDMA memory check UCX version

Why?

To be handled in UCX 1.22

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Updated hardware support detection for RDMA to use the correct library version threshold, improving compatibility verification accuracy.

[github-actions]

👋 Hi ovidiusm! Thank you for contributing to ai-dynamo/nixl.

Your PR reviewers will review your contribution then trigger the CI to test your changes.

🚀

[ovidiusm]

/build

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A UCX version threshold for RDMA memory type validation in the warnAboutHardwareSupportMismatch() function was updated from version 1.21 to 1.22, with the associated comment revised accordingly.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
UCX Version Threshold Update src/plugins/ucx/ucx_utils.cpp	Updated UCX version check for RDMA memory type support from UCP_VERSION(1, 21) to UCP_VERSION(1, 22); adjusted corresponding comment.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A version bump, so small and neat,
From twenty-one to twenty-two so sweet,
The RDMA check now knows its place,
With updated threshold, keeping pace! 🚀

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'Bump RDMA memory check UCX version' is clear and specific, accurately describing the main change of raising the UCX version threshold for RDMA memory checks.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description includes the required 'What?' and 'Why?' sections with appropriate content, though lacks the optional 'How?' section for additional technical context.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

📝 Coding Plan

• Generate coding plan for human review comments

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@src/plugins/ucx/ucx_utils.cpp`:
- Around line 643-644: The code incorrectly checks against a non-existent UCX
version UCP_VERSION(1,22); change the threshold in ucx_utils.cpp where
ucpVersion_ is compared (the if (ucpVersion_ >= UCP_VERSION(1, 22)) check) to
the correct existing release macro (use UCP_VERSION(1, 20) to match UCX
v1.20.0), and also update the corresponding test reference in
test/gtest/hw_warning_test.cpp (replace UCP_VERSION(1, 21) with UCP_VERSION(1,
20)) so both the runtime check and the test use the same valid UCX version
macro.

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 0be1637e-1428-41db-a5b8-49fcabe9be24

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 200f649 and 925e670.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/plugins/ucx/ucx_utils.cpp

[ovidiusm]

/build