Skip to content

Conversation

@MatthewDaggitt
Copy link
Collaborator

Reasons for this change:

  1. Should live in Data.List.NonEmpty.Base but because they mixed computation and proofs they could not.
  2. The names weren't very descriptive of what they did. N.B. I'm open to shortening them to groupSeqs and ungroupSeqs if people would prefer.
  3. They were blocking the deprecation of the inspect idiom in Attempt at deprecating inspect idiom #1630

@MatthewDaggitt MatthewDaggitt merged commit a9e97a3 into master Mar 8, 2022
@MatthewDaggitt MatthewDaggitt deleted the nonempty-ops-refactor branch March 8, 2022 09:32
@andreasabel andreasabel mentioned this pull request Aug 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants