Skip to content

containerd CRI plugin: Checkpoint restore bypasses destination security context

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Sep 1, 2026 in containerd/containerd • Updated Oct 15, 2026

Package

gomod github.com/containerd/containerd/v2 (Go)

Affected versions

>= 2.1.0, < 2.2.7
>= 2.3.0, < 2.3.4

Patched versions

2.2.7
2.3.4

Description

Impact

A vulnerability in containerd's CRI implementation allows a container restored from an untrusted checkpoint via the CreateContainer API to bypass the destination security context and execute with elevated privileges. When restoring a container from a checkpoint archive or annotated OCI image, CRIU restores process credentials, Linux capabilities, no_new_privs, and seccomp state directly from checkpoint data rather than enforcing the destination CRI ContainerConfig. An attacker who can run a container with a crafted checkpoint image can execute processes as root with full capabilities and no enforced seccomp filters despite restrictive security policies requested by the orchestrator. Additionally, containerd's CRI status reporting reflects the requested configuration rather than the actual restored process state, masking the privilege discrepancy from orchestrators. This issue affects Linux systems running containerd with CRI checkpoint restore enabled; users not utilizing CRI checkpoint restore are not affected.

Patches

This bug has been addressed in containerd 2.2.7 and 2.3.4 by disabling checkpoint restore via CreateContainer by default. The feature has been removed entirely in containerd 2.4.0. Users should update to these versions to resolve the issue. Running containers that were restored from untrusted checkpoints should be stopped, deleted, and recreated.

Users who rely on restore via the CreateContainer API can re-enable the feature by setting the new enable_experimental_restore_via_create configuration option. However, enabling restore via CreateContainer leaves this vulnerability present, as containerd cannot enforce destination security policy during CRIU process restoration.

Workarounds

On unpatched versions, containerd does not provide a configuration option to disable checkpoint restore via CreateContainer. Deployments should restrict container creation permissions to trusted users, validate container image registries, or use admission controllers to reject images containing checkpoint data.

References

Credits

The containerd project would like to thank @l2yyd5 and @berkpolatCE for responsibly disclosing this issue in accordance with the containerd security policy.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

To report a security issue in containerd:

References

@samuelkarp samuelkarp published to containerd/containerd Sep 1, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Oct 12, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Oct 15, 2026
Reviewed Oct 15, 2026
Last updated Oct 15, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(1st percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Privilege Management

The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-95837

GHSA ID

GHSA-p7v4-vr35-mj6f

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.