Skip to content

Open WebUI: Terminal proxy forwards a spoofable, integrity-unbound user identity to the upstream (X-User-Id header and ws_terminal session_id query injection)

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jul 2, 2026 in open-webui/open-webui • Updated Jul 24, 2026

Package

pip open-webui (pip)

Affected versions

< 0.10.0

Patched versions

0.10.0

Description

Summary

The terminal proxy in backend/open_webui/routers/terminals.py forwards the Open WebUI user's identity to the upstream terminal server / backend coordinator as an authorization claim, with no cryptographic binding to the session that produced it. The forwarded identity is attacker-influenceable on both proxy paths:

  1. HTTP path (proxy_terminal) sets headers['X-User-Id'] = user.id. Upstreams that trust X-User-Id as identity receive it unsigned, so an attacker who can reach the upstream by other means (directly, a compromised peer, SSRF) can spoof it.

  2. WebSocket path (ws_terminal) is exploitable through Open WebUI itself, with no "other means" required. It interpolates the path parameter session_id directly into the upstream URL and then appends ?user_id=<caller>:

    upstream_url = f'{ws_base}/p/{policy_id}/api/terminals/{session_id}'
    upstream_url += f'?{urllib.parse.urlencode({"user_id": user.id})}'

session_id is neither validated nor URL-encoded (the HTTP sibling runs _sanitize_proxy_path; this path runs nothing). An encoded ?/& smuggled through session_id survives Open WebUI's single decode and is re-decoded by the upstream, injecting an attacker-chosen user_id ahead of the appended one. Query parsing binds the first occurrence, so the backend coordinator resolves the spoofed user's terminal scope.

Technical Details

The forwarded terminal identity is a bearer-style authorization claim with no integrity binding, and on the WebSocket path it is additionally injectable because session_id is concatenated into the URL without encoding or delimiter validation.

Impact

A normal authenticated user can make the terminal proxy present another user's identity to the upstream backend coordinator. On backend coordinator-backed (policy_id) servers that scope terminal containers by user_id, this reaches another user's terminal scope; combined with a known active session ID (for example a chat-scoped session ID surfaced through a shared chat), it allows attaching to that user's live PTY. The HTTP-path variant additionally allows identity spoofing at the upstream tier for any deployment whose upstream trusts X-User-Id.

Appendix: Affected code

  • backend/open_webui/routers/terminals.pyproxy_terminal sets headers['X-User-Id'] = user.id with no signature.
  • backend/open_webui/routers/terminals.pyws_terminal builds the upstream URL from an unvalidated, unencoded session_id and appends user_id as a query parameter, allowing query injection.

Appendix: Consolidation

Per the Report Handling policy, this consolidates independent reports of the same root cause (the forwarded terminal identity is spoofable / not integrity-bound) into the earliest filing:

  • @smoke-wolf (earliest filing) — the X-User-Id HTTP-path identity is forwarded without integrity binding, spoofable where the upstream trusts the header.
  • @rexpository — the ws_terminal session_id query-injection vector, proving the forwarded user_id is spoofable through the Open WebUI proxy itself, with no "reach the upstream by other means" precondition.

Appendix: Recommended fix

  • Validate and URL-encode session_id before building the upstream URL (urllib.parse.quote(session_id, safe=""); reject ?, #, &, /, %, backslash, control characters). Build the query string with a URL builder so attacker-controlled path content cannot precede it.
  • Bind the forwarded identity instead of passing a raw user_id / X-User-Id: emit a short-lived signed claim (for example HS256 over {uid, iat, aud:server_id} with a key shared only with the specific upstream) and verify it upstream.

References

@doge-woof doge-woof published to open-webui/open-webui Jul 2, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jul 9, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jul 24, 2026
Reviewed Jul 24, 2026
Last updated Jul 24, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(21st percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Authentication

When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct. Learn more on MITRE.

Authentication Bypass by Spoofing

This attack-focused weakness is caused by incorrectly implemented authentication schemes that are subject to spoofing attacks. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-59224

GHSA ID

GHSA-j657-m4c4-24jq

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.