Incorrect wrapping of `\verb`

[fabawi]

Perhaps related to #104 , but the splitting of \verb+...+ occurs for commands contained within the + symbols anyway. As far as I can tell, this only happens when \verb contains a command or an environment:

In case of double column layout, tables which do not fit in single column width should be set to full text width. For this, you need to use \verb+\begin{table*}+ \verb+...+ \verb+\end{table*}+ instead of \verb+\begin{table}+ \verb+...+ \verb+\end{table}+ environment. Lengthy tables which do not fit in textwidth should be set as rotated table. For this, you need to use \verb+\begin{sidewaystable}+ \verb+...+ \verb+\end{sidewaystable}+ instead of \verb+\begin{table*}+ \verb+...+ \verb+\end{table*}+ environment. This environment puts tables rotated to single column width. For tables rotated to double column width, use \verb+\begin{sidewaystable*}+ \verb+...+ \verb+\end{sidewaystable*}+.

Which becomes:

In case of double column layout, tables which do not fit in single
column width should be set to full text width. For this, you need to use \verb+
\begin{table*}+ \verb+...+ \verb+
\end{table*}+ instead of \verb+
\begin{table}+ \verb+...+ \verb+
\end{table}+ environment. Lengthy tables which do not fit in
textwidth should be set as rotated table. For this, you need to use \verb+
\begin{sidewaystable}+ \verb+...+ \verb+
\end{sidewaystable}+ instead of \verb+
\begin{table*}+ \verb+...+ \verb+
\end{table*}+ environment. This environment puts tables rotated to
single column width. For tables rotated to double column width, use \verb+
\begin{sidewaystable*}+ \verb+...+ \verb+
\end{sidewaystable*}+.

This results in the following error:

\verb ended by end of line.

NOTE: I used the following Springer template sample (sn-article.tex) in case you'd want to test it on other instances.

Very useful tool by the way, thanks for providing it

[WGUNDERWOOD]

Thanks for this; I did not realise that people use \verb+...+ as well as \verb|...|. I understand that any character can be used here but would prefer to limit matching to common choices! This has been fixed in f6df272; your provided file now formats to the following:

In case of double column layout, tables which do not fit in single
column width should be set to full text width. For this, you need to
use \verb+\begin{table*}+ \verb+...+ \verb+\end{table*}+ instead of
\verb+\begin{table}+ \verb+...+ \verb+\end{table}+ environment.
Lengthy tables which do not fit in textwidth should be set as rotated
table. For this, you need to use \verb+\begin{sidewaystable}+
\verb+...+ \verb+\end{sidewaystable}+ instead of
\verb+\begin{table*}+ \verb+...+ \verb+\end{table*}+ environment.
This environment puts tables rotated to single column width. For
tables rotated to double column width, use
\verb+\begin{sidewaystable*}+ \verb+...+ \verb+\end{sidewaystable*}+.