Remove experiments/eval_tool_description folder

[therealnb]

Summary

Removes the src/experiments/eval_tool_description folder as it has been superseded by the main application's ToolQualityService.

Rationale

This experimental code provided functionality to evaluate MCP tool descriptions on clarity, completeness, and conciseness. However:

• ✅ The main application's ToolQualityService provides the same functionality but is integrated into the API
• ✅ The experiments folder was not referenced anywhere in the main application code
• ✅ It was not documented in the README
• ✅ It was not part of Taskfile automation
• ✅ It appears to be prototype/research code that was superseded

The main application's tool quality analysis is accessible via the API and is more integrated with the rest of the system.

Changes

• Deleted src/experiments/eval_tool_description/ folder and all contents (10 files, ~21k lines)
• No other code changes needed (no references to clean up)

Testing

• ✅ Verified no references to eval_tool_description exist outside the experiments folder
• ✅ Confirmed ToolQualityService provides equivalent functionality

[therealnb]

@claude review this PR

[claude]

Claude encountered an error after 1s —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

[claude]

Claude encountered an error after 0s —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

[therealnb]

@claude review it

[claude]

Claude encountered an error after 0s —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

[claude]

Claude encountered an error after 1s —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

[claude]

Claude encountered an error after 0s —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

[claude]

Claude finished @therealnb's task in 1m 35s —— View job

---

PR Review: Remove experiments/eval_tool_description folder

Todo List

• Read repository CLAUDE.md for guidelines
• Review the workflow file changes (.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml)
• Verify no remaining references to deleted code
• Confirm ToolQualityService provides equivalent functionality
• Review PR changes and provide feedback

---

Review Summary

✅ Approved - This is a clean removal of obsolete experimental code. The PR is well-justified and safely removes ~21k lines of superseded code.

Key Findings

✅ Strengths

1. Proper Justification: The experimental code is genuinely superseded

   • ToolQualityService (src/mcp_tef/services/tool_quality_service.py:58-149) provides identical functionality
   • Evaluates tools on clarity, completeness, and conciseness (same dimensions)
   • Integrated into the main API at /mcp-servers/tools/quality endpoint
   • Better integration: async, concurrent, production-ready

2. Clean Removal: No dangling references

   • ✅ Verified via grep - zero references to eval_tool_description in codebase
   • ✅ No imports to clean up
   • ✅ No tests breaking from removal

3. Workflow Improvements: Unrelated but valuable fixes in .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml

   • Removed incorrect gh pr comment instruction (action handles this via MCP)
   • Removed unnecessary claude_args with gh CLI tool allowlist
   • Better documentation explaining automatic comment handling

🔍 Code Comparison

Deleted experimental code (src/experiments/eval_tool_description/):

• Standalone script with JSON file I/O
• Synchronous execution
• ~100 LOC runner + models + prompts
• Not integrated with main API

Current production code (ToolQualityService):

• Integrated FastAPI service
• Async/concurrent processing (via asyncio.gather)
• Pydantic models with proper validation
• Exposed at GET /mcp-servers/tools/quality
• Supports batch processing of multiple server URLs
• Better error handling and logging

The production implementation is superior in every way.

📝 Minor Observations

1. Workflow changes are unrelated to the main deletion but are beneficial fixes

   • Consider: These could have been in a separate commit for cleaner git history
   • However: The changes are small and improve the workflow used by this PR's review

2. Constitution compliance: Deletion aligns with project principles

   • Removes unused code (principle: maintainability)
   • ToolQualityService follows all 10 constitutional principles (Pydantic models, async, etc.)

Verdict

LGTM 🚢 - Safe to merge. The experimental code served its purpose (prototyping tool quality evaluation) and has been properly superseded by production-quality implementation.

---