Skip to content

Fix Logic Requirements Not Checking Inversion#891

Merged
VMSolidus merged 1 commit intoSimple-Station:masterfrom
DEATHB4DEFEAT:fix-logic-reqs
Sep 9, 2024
Merged

Fix Logic Requirements Not Checking Inversion#891
VMSolidus merged 1 commit intoSimple-Station:masterfrom
DEATHB4DEFEAT:fix-logic-reqs

Conversation

@DEATHB4DEFEAT
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@DEATHB4DEFEAT DEATHB4DEFEAT added Priority: 2-High Needs to be resolved soon Size: 5-Very Small For especially small issues/PRs Type: Bug [Un]intentional issue with something Type: Cleanup Like Rework but small labels Sep 9, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Changes: C# Changes any cs files label Sep 9, 2024
@SimpleStation14 SimpleStation14 changed the title fix logic requirements not checking inversion Fix Logic Requirements Not Checking Inversion Sep 9, 2024
@DEATHB4DEFEAT DEATHB4DEFEAT requested review from a team, OldDanceJacket, Peptide90, Pspritechologist, ShadesMars and VMSolidus and removed request for a team September 9, 2024 04:48
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Status: Needs Review Someone please review this label Sep 9, 2024
@VMSolidus
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

image

image

Now I buy the trait...

image

image

Excellent. Let's go.

@VMSolidus VMSolidus merged commit cd3c598 into Simple-Station:master Sep 9, 2024
Mnemotechnician pushed a commit to Mnemotechnician/Einstein-Engines that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2024
Mnemotechnician pushed a commit to Mnemotechnician/Einstein-Engines that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Changes: C# Changes any cs files Priority: 2-High Needs to be resolved soon Size: 5-Very Small For especially small issues/PRs Status: Needs Review Someone please review this Type: Bug [Un]intentional issue with something Type: Cleanup Like Rework but small

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants