[py][BiDi] use constant for LogLevel

[Delta456]

User description

🔗 Related Issues

💥 What does this PR do?

Use typed string for LogLevel which matches the rest bindings

🔧 Implementation Notes

💡 Additional Considerations

🔄 Types of changes

• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality and tests!)

---

PR Type

Enhancement, Tests

---

Description

• Introduced LogLevel constants for BiDi log levels

• Updated tests to use LogLevel constants

• Improved consistency with other Selenium bindings

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	log.py Add LogLevel constants for BiDi logging                                    py/selenium/webdriver/common/bidi/log.py Added LogLevel class with log level constants Provided documentation for the new class +9/-0
Tests	bidi_script_tests.py Update BiDi log tests to use LogLevel constants                    py/test/selenium/webdriver/common/bidi_script_tests.py Imported and used LogLevel constants in assertions Replaced string literals with LogLevel usage in tests +4/-3

---

Need help?

Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.

Check out the documentation for more information.

[qodo-code-review]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

🎫 Ticket compliance analysis ❌ 1234 - Not compliant Non-compliant requirements: • Fix issue where JavaScript in link's href is not triggered on click() in Firefox 42.0 Requires further human verification: • Need to verify if the PR's changes have any impact on the Firefox click() behavior, though it appears unrelated 5678 - Not compliant Non-compliant requirements: • Fix "Error: ConnectFailure (Connection refused)" when instantiating ChromeDriver Requires further human verification: • Need to verify if the PR's changes have any impact on ChromeDriver connection issues, though it appears unrelated

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪

🧪 PR contains tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ No major issues detected

[qodo-code-review]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.

[cgoldberg]

LGTM 👍

[navin772]

LGTM!

[cgoldberg]

for some reason your branch failed when building the docs.. I can't see anything you changed that would cause that. I just merged trunk into your branch to run CI again.