CI Status: BROKEN
The master branch is currently failing CI checks. This was detected during an automated CI health check.
Test PR: #38
Failed CI Run: https://github.com/SciML/PDESystemLibrary.jl/actions/runs/20799079910
Summary
CI is broken due to two distinct issues:
- Dependency resolution failure in the
alldeps test (Julia 1.10)
- MethodError in all MethodOfLines tests across all Julia versions (1, lts, pre)
Issue 1: Dependency Resolution Failure (alldeps test)
Failed Job: test (alldeps, 1.10)
Duration: 51 seconds
Log: https://github.com/SciML/PDESystemLibrary.jl/actions/runs/20799079912/job/59739857080
Error Details
ERROR: LoadError: Unsatisfiable requirements detected for package MethodOfLines [94925ecb]:
MethodOfLines [94925ecb] log:
├─possible versions are: 0.1.0-0.11.9 or uninstalled
├─restricted to versions * by project [427c309f], leaving only versions: 0.1.0-0.11.9
├─restricted by compatibility requirements with Symbolics [0c5d862f] to versions: [0.8.3-0.8.4, 0.9.0-0.11.0] or uninstalled
│ └─Symbolics [0c5d862f] log:
│ ├─possible versions are: 0.1.0-7.5.0 or uninstalled
│ └─restricted to versions 5.25.2 by an explicit requirement, leaving only versions: 5.25.2
└─restricted by compatibility requirements with ModelingToolkit [961ee093] to versions: uninstalled — no versions left
└─ModelingToolkit [961ee093] log:
├─possible versions are: 0.0.1-11.5.1 or uninstalled
├─restricted to versions 9-11 by project [427c309f], leaving only versions: 9.0.0-11.5.1
└─restricted to versions 9.0.0 by an explicit requirement, leaving only versions: 9.0.0
Root Cause
The alldeps downgrade test is attempting to find the minimum compatible versions but encounters an unsatisfiable dependency constraint:
- The downgrade resolver selected
Symbolics 5.25.2 and ModelingToolkit 9.0.0
- These versions are incompatible with any version of
MethodOfLines
- MethodOfLines compatible with Symbolics 5.25.2 requires a newer ModelingToolkit (>9.0.0)
- This indicates the compat bounds in Project.toml may be too loose or there's a gap in the dependency graph
Issue 2: MethodError in MethodOfLines Tests
Failed Jobs:
Duration: ~28 minutes each
Error Details
All MOL examples are failing with the same error pattern:
Example: heat_1d1: Error During Test at /home/runner/work/PDESystemLibrary.jl/PDESystemLibrary.jl/test/mol_test.jl:10
Got exception outside of a @test
MethodError: Cannot `convert` an object of type
Pair{Symbolics.Num, Float64} to an object of type
SymbolicUtils.Symbolic
The function `convert` exists, but no method is defined for this combination of argument types.
Stacktrace:
[1] setindex!(h::Dict{SymbolicUtils.Symbolic, Nothing}, v0::Nothing, key0::Pair{Symbolics.Num, Float64})
@ Base ./dict.jl:346
[2] push!(s::Set{SymbolicUtils.Symbolic}, x::Pair{Symbolics.Num, Float64})
@ Base ./set.jl:137
[3] ModelingToolkit.TearingState(sys::ModelingToolkit.System; quick_cancel::Bool, check::Bool, sort_eqs::Bool)
@ ModelingToolkit ~/.julia/packages/ModelingToolkit/Ay2JZ/src/systems/systemstructure.jl:377
Root Cause
This appears to be a type incompatibility introduced by recent changes in ModelingToolkit or Symbolics:
- The code is trying to insert a
Pair{Symbolics.Num, Float64} into a Set{SymbolicUtils.Symbolic}
- The conversion from
Pair{Symbolics.Num, Float64} to SymbolicUtils.Symbolic is not defined
- This is happening during the
TearingState construction in ModelingToolkit's structural transformation
This suggests either:
- An upstream breaking change in ModelingToolkit or Symbolics that PDESystemLibrary hasn't adapted to
- The systems in this library are passing parameters in a format that's no longer supported
Affected Tests
Passing:
- ✅ test (NeuralPDE, 1)
- ✅ test (NeuralPDE, lts)
- ✅ test (NeuralPDE, pre)
- ✅ Spell Check with Typos
- ✅ build
Failing:
- ❌ test (MOL, 1)
- ❌ test (MOL, lts)
- ❌ test (MOL, pre)
- ❌ test (alldeps, 1.10)
Suggested Fix Approach
For Issue 1 (alldeps):
- Review the compat bounds in
Project.toml for ModelingToolkit, Symbolics, and MethodOfLines
- Tighten the lower bounds if necessary to ensure a valid dependency resolution exists
- Consider whether the minimum versions are actually being tested in practice
For Issue 2 (MethodError):
- Check recent releases of ModelingToolkit and Symbolics for breaking changes
- Review how PDESystem parameters are being passed (look for
D => 1.0 style pairs)
- May need to update the parameter specification format in the library systems
- Coordinate with ModelingToolkit team if this is an upstream issue
Additional Information
- Detection Date: 2026-01-07
- All failures are reproducible across multiple Julia versions
- NeuralPDE tests pass, suggesting the issue is specific to MethodOfLines integration
cc @ChrisRackauckas
CI Status: BROKEN
The master branch is currently failing CI checks. This was detected during an automated CI health check.
Test PR: #38
Failed CI Run: https://github.com/SciML/PDESystemLibrary.jl/actions/runs/20799079910
Summary
CI is broken due to two distinct issues:
alldepstest (Julia 1.10)Issue 1: Dependency Resolution Failure (alldeps test)
Failed Job: test (alldeps, 1.10)
Duration: 51 seconds
Log: https://github.com/SciML/PDESystemLibrary.jl/actions/runs/20799079912/job/59739857080
Error Details
Root Cause
The
alldepsdowngrade test is attempting to find the minimum compatible versions but encounters an unsatisfiable dependency constraint:Symbolics 5.25.2andModelingToolkit 9.0.0MethodOfLinesIssue 2: MethodError in MethodOfLines Tests
Failed Jobs:
Duration: ~28 minutes each
Error Details
All MOL examples are failing with the same error pattern:
Root Cause
This appears to be a type incompatibility introduced by recent changes in ModelingToolkit or Symbolics:
Pair{Symbolics.Num, Float64}into aSet{SymbolicUtils.Symbolic}Pair{Symbolics.Num, Float64}toSymbolicUtils.Symbolicis not definedTearingStateconstruction in ModelingToolkit's structural transformationThis suggests either:
Affected Tests
Passing:
Failing:
Suggested Fix Approach
For Issue 1 (alldeps):
Project.tomlfor ModelingToolkit, Symbolics, and MethodOfLinesFor Issue 2 (MethodError):
D => 1.0style pairs)Additional Information
cc @ChrisRackauckas