Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link

@renovate renovate bot commented Aug 10, 2019

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
babel-eslint 8.0.1 -> 8.2.6 age adoption passing confidence
babel-loader 7.1.2 -> 7.1.5 age adoption passing confidence
babel-preset-env (source) 1.6.1 -> 1.7.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

babel/babel-eslint

v8.2.6

Compare Source

v8.2.5

Compare Source

v8.2.4

Compare Source

v8.2.3

Compare Source

v8.2.2

Compare Source

v8.2.1

Compare Source

v8.2.0

Compare Source

v8.1.2

Compare Source

v8.1.1

Compare Source

v8.1.0

Compare Source

Use ESLint's API to customize scope analysis and avoid monkeypatching: https://github.com/babel/babel-eslint/pull/542

v8.0.3

Compare Source

v8.0.2

Compare Source

babel/babel-loader

v7.1.5

Compare Source

v7.1.5

v7.1.4: 7.1.4

Compare Source

🐛 Bug Fix
  • Update code to read filename

v7.1.3: 7.1.3

Compare Source

🐛 Bug Fix
  • Support webpack 4
babel/babel-preset-env

v1.7.0

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update babel monorepo chore(deps): update babel monorepo - autoclosed Mar 16, 2023
@renovate renovate bot closed this Mar 16, 2023
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/babel-monorepo branch March 16, 2023 13:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants