Skip to content

Conversation

@baloo
Copy link
Member

@baloo baloo commented May 3, 2023

Added

Changed

Fixed

@baloo baloo force-pushed the baloo/x509-cert/0.2.2 branch 2 times, most recently from 6e29d0b to c9617ab Compare May 10, 2023 19:05
Added
- Certificate builder (RustCrypto#764)
- Support for `RandomizedSigner` in builder (RustCrypto#1007)
- Provide parsing profiles (RustCrypto#987)
- Support for `Time::INFINITY` (RustCrypto#1024)
- Conversion from `std::net::IpAddr` (RustCrypto#1035)
- `CertReq` builder (RustCrypto#1034)
- missing extension implementations (RustCrypto#1050)
- notes about `UTCTime` range being 1970-2049 (RustCrypto#1052)
- consume the `SignatureBitStringEncoding` trait (RustCrypto#1048)

Changed
- use `ErrorKind::Value` for overlength serial (RustCrypto#988)
- Bump `hex-literal` to v0.4.1 (RustCrypto#999)
- Builder updates (RustCrypto#1001)
- better debug info when `zlint` isn't installed (RustCrypto#1018)
- make SKI optional in leaf certificate (RustCrypto#1028)
- bump rsa from 0.9.0-pre.2 to 0.9.0 (RustCrypto#1033)
- bump rsa from 0.9.1 to 0.9.2 (RustCrypto#1056)

Fixed
- fix `KeyUsage` bit tests (RustCrypto#993)
- extraneous PhantomData in `TbsCertificate` (RustCrypto#1017)
- CI flakiness (RustCrypto#1042)
- usage of ecdsa signer (RustCrypto#1043)
@baloo baloo force-pushed the baloo/x509-cert/0.2.2 branch from c9617ab to dbeced4 Compare May 11, 2023 18:00
@baloo baloo marked this pull request as ready for review May 19, 2023 06:03
@baloo
Copy link
Member Author

baloo commented May 19, 2023

No issues raised since the last pre-release a week ago. I think we can release this? WDYT?

@baloo baloo merged commit bbbc73d into RustCrypto:master May 19, 2023
@baloo baloo deleted the baloo/x509-cert/0.2.2 branch May 19, 2023 15:47
baloo added a commit to baloo/formats that referenced this pull request May 19, 2023
Got a bit excited with RustCrypto#1040 and pressed merge too early.
@baloo baloo mentioned this pull request May 19, 2023
baloo added a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2023
Got a bit excited with #1040 and pressed merge too early.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants