document says that `Observable` has `let` operator as default but not in implementation

[berlysia]

RxJS version:
v5.5, v6

Code to reproduce:
with v6.0.0-alpha.3:

require('rxjs/index').Observable.create().let(x => x);
require('rxjs/index').Observable.create().pipe(x => x);

in v5.5, replace 'rxjs/index' with 'rxjs/Observable'

Expected behavior:
same result

ref. doc/pipeable-operators.md

The let operator is now part of Observable as pipe and cannot be imported.

Actual behavior:

require('rxjs/index').Observable.create().let(x => x); // let is not a function
require('rxjs/index').Observable.create().pipe(x => x); // properly works

Which is correct, implementation or document?

[dengwanc]

did U sure create() is OK ?

THIS IS MY CODE
node v7
rxjs v6 aplha

const { Observable, Subject, ReplaySubject } = require('rxjs');
const log = x => console.log(x);

Observable.of(1)
    .let(x => x)
    .subscribe(log);

[berlysia]

RxJS v6.0.0-alpha3 has a problem about main field of package.json.
This problem causes the constructor of Observable imported by require('rxjs') is patched all of operators, and this problem is fixed in #3316.

FYI: src/internal/Observable.ts does not have let operator, but has pipe operator.

[benlesh]

The current docs are for v5... in v6 let is just pipe with one argument.

[lock]

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.