RCP-240327A: Computed state

[dr-orlovsky]

layers: consensus
consensus: fast-forward

In schema, we can have a global and owned state, which is computed from the contract state. Possible use cases for this: inflationary/deflationary assets,

This can be added as an additional global and owned state type enum variant, and may contain a reference on a transforming script, underlying data type (if any), resulting data type, and the data source (result register).

[dr-orlovsky]

In v0.12 it is not consensus anymore

[vt3rk9ey95wxk]

Will the introduction of this state bring any technical problems?

[dr-orlovsky]

Well, any functionality may bring technical problems. Also, absence of a functionality may also bring technical problems.

So can you pls be more specific which kinds of technical problems you are asking about?