-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
Fix constructor inheritance #351
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
supersaiyansubtlety
wants to merge
5
commits into
QuiltMC:develop/2.8
Choose a base branch
from
supersaiyansubtlety:fix-constructor-inheritance
base: develop/2.8
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+51
−8
Open
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c3ecd59
add constructor inheritance test input
supersaiyansubtlety 28c707f
add (failing) noConstructorInheritance test
supersaiyansubtlety bb50c2e
fix resolving constructors in IndexEntryResolver
supersaiyansubtlety 84a1c2f
clarify javadoc
supersaiyansubtlety 0cedb92
Merge branch 'develop/2.8' into fix-constructor-inheritance
supersaiyansubtlety File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
7 changes: 7 additions & 0 deletions
7
enigma/src/test/java/org/quiltmc/enigma/input/inheritance_tree/ConstructorParent.java
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ | ||
| package org.quiltmc.enigma.input.inheritance_tree; | ||
|
|
||
| public class ConstructorParent { | ||
| ConstructorParent() { } | ||
|
|
||
| ConstructorParent(int i) { } | ||
| } |
7 changes: 7 additions & 0 deletions
7
enigma/src/test/java/org/quiltmc/enigma/input/inheritance_tree/ConstructorSubClass.java
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ | ||
| package org.quiltmc.enigma.input.inheritance_tree; | ||
|
|
||
| class ConstructorSubClass extends ConstructorParent { | ||
| ConstructorSubClass() { } | ||
|
|
||
| ConstructorSubClass(int i) { } | ||
| } |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this only checks for
FieldEntrys whenaccessis non-null, as beforethat doesn't seem correct, but changing it breaks tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc @IotaBread
reordering the check breaks shadow behaviour
i don't know exactly when the access will be null -- if we can predict which fields will have their definitions indexed, we need to document our reliance on that behaviour, and if we can't, this needs to be changed