Hi! Thanks for your excellent work.
I noticed that you stated in Table 8 of your paper that the results of EfficientNet's 4-bit quantization LSQ (baseline) were reproduced by yourself, but when I reproduced it with this code (with osc_freeze.threshold=None and osc_damp.weight_final=None), I found that the accuracy of the baseline was 73.2, which does not match the results in your paper (72.3).
I can reproduce the results of LSQ+Freeze and LSQ+Dampen in the paper, but the results of baseline are much higher than those listed in the paper, what code does your baseline use? Did I get it wrong?
Thanks! Looking forward to your reply!
Hi! Thanks for your excellent work.
I noticed that you stated in Table 8 of your paper that the results of EfficientNet's 4-bit quantization LSQ (baseline) were reproduced by yourself, but when I reproduced it with this code (with
osc_freeze.threshold=Noneandosc_damp.weight_final=None), I found that the accuracy of the baseline was 73.2, which does not match the results in your paper (72.3).I can reproduce the results of LSQ+Freeze and LSQ+Dampen in the paper, but the results of baseline are much higher than those listed in the paper, what code does your baseline use? Did I get it wrong?
Thanks! Looking forward to your reply!