[docs] Update "About Pipelines" list

[alaninnovates]

Description

In the About Pipelines page, move the reflective pipeline down the list because students don't encounter this after FIRST removed it from their games. Also, mention object detection as a pipeline type.

Closes #1849

Meta

Merge checklist:

• Pull Request title is short, imperative summary of proposed changes
• The description documents the what and why
• If this PR changes behavior or adds a feature, user documentation is updated
• If this PR touches photon-serde, all messages have been regenerated and hashes have not changed unexpectedly
• If this PR touches configuration, this is backwards compatible with settings back to v2024.3.1
• If this PR touches pipeline settings or anything related to data exchange, the frontend typing is updated
• If this PR addresses a bug, a regression test for it is added

[samfreund]

Can you move reflective to under colored shapes, as colored shapes are more likely to be used than reflective? If you could add a note under reflective that it is no longer used as well, that would be great.

Listing the steps and different inputs for the object detection pipeline at the bottom would be great too.

[samfreund]

Sorry, looks like I should've been more clear. I was hoping you could add the different input options under the pipeline steps section, similar to how the inputs for the other pipelines are explained.

[alaninnovates]

Do you mean in the actual "About Object Detection" page? I just read it and it does touch on some of the sliders. Should I clarify confidence more?

[samfreund]

Do you mean in the actual "About Object Detection" page? I just read it and it does touch on some of the sliders. Should I clarify confidence more?

At the bottom of page you're currently editing, there's a section called pipeline steps.

[samfreund]

Looking really good!

You can probably remove this sentence

In the object detection tab of this pipeline type, you can configure the confidence threshold and apply filters based on area and width/height ratio.

as its covered below.

Edit: completed

[alaninnovates]

Instead of referring to each tab as a "step", should we just refer to them as tabs? (i.e. "Pipeline Tabs")

[samfreund]

Instead of referring to each tab as a "step", should we just refer to them as tabs? (i.e. "Pipeline Tabs")

Yeah, I agree. Otherwise, looks good.