-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
Fix sendrecv ut #6983
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix sendrecv ut #6983
Conversation
Yancey0623
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I haven't seen the code about how to deal with SIGINT in the send side(trainer), or maybe you have any other idea?
| } | ||
|
|
||
| virtual ~RecvOp() { | ||
| void Stop() override { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we also need the destructor function, and call Stop() in it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No. recv_op's Run may run in another thread (in unit test), Stop must be called out side dtor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So we also need to add the interface to pybind , maybe we coud do that in another PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep. We can add it later when running in different clusters.
Yancey0623
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Yancey0623
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM++
fix #6978
fix #6893