docs: add comment explaining execution delay value in AccessManaged test

[forkfury]

Add explanatory comment for the 911n execution delay value used in AccessManaged tests.

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 66ff321

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A comment was added to the executionDelay assignment in test/access/manager/AccessManaged.test.js. The numeric value (911n) remains unchanged. This is a non-functional modification that only adds explanatory text alongside the existing code. No control flow, error handling, or exported entities were affected by this change.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title Check	✅ Passed	The title "docs: add comment explaining execution delay value in AccessManaged test" is fully related to the main change in the pull request. The raw summary confirms that the only modification is a comment appended to the executionDelay assignment in the test file, with no functional changes to the code. The title is specific, clear, and accurately describes the addition of documentation/comments, using the appropriate "docs:" prefix for this type of change. The title is neither vague nor misleading.
Description Check	✅ Passed	The pull request description "Add explanatory comment for the 911n execution delay value used in AccessManaged tests" is related to the changeset. It directly describes the modification confirmed in the raw summary—adding a comment to explain a specific value—and provides relevant context by mentioning the specific numeric value (911n) and the test file context. The description is appropriately detailed for this type of documentation change and clearly conveys what was done.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1cf1377 and 66ff321.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• test/access/manager/AccessManaged.test.js (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (9)

• GitHub Check: coverage
• GitHub Check: tests-foundry
• GitHub Check: tests-upgradeable
• GitHub Check: tests
• GitHub Check: slither
• GitHub Check: halmos
• GitHub Check: Redirect rules - solidity-contracts
• GitHub Check: Header rules - solidity-contracts
• GitHub Check: Pages changed - solidity-contracts

🔇 Additional comments (1)

test/access/manager/AccessManaged.test.js (1)

68-68: Great documentation improvement!

The comment clearly explains why an arbitrary numeric value was chosen for the execution delay parameter, making the test intent more obvious to future maintainers.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}