Skip to content

Conversation

@andrew-fleming
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Comment on lines 6 to +7
- Use OpenZeppelin Contracts for Cairo v0.15.0. ([#378](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/contracts-wizard/pull/378))
- Use OpenZeppelin Contracts for Cairo v0.16.0. ([#384](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/contracts-wizard/pull/384))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we keep the previous change mentioning 0.15.0?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we should overwrite changes in the changelog. I'd keep it in

starknet = "2.7.0"
openzeppelin = { git = "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/cairo-contracts.git", tag = "v0.15.0" }
starknet = "2.8.0"
openzeppelin = { git = "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/cairo-contracts.git", tag = "v0.16.0" }
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we specify it as openzeppelin = "0.16.0?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should the readme steps on https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/cairo-contracts also use that format?

@ericglau ericglau merged commit 0532980 into OpenZeppelin:master Sep 10, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jun 20, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Aug 20, 2025
This was referenced Sep 9, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Sep 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants