Small rework of verify hijack #1707
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Too many nested if/else's makes it highly unreadable between OAuth and OpenID i.e. easier commit history searching. Been thinking about doing this since removal commit... doing it. * Probable location to add `aToken` to which is actually `aAccessToken` in dep README's. Possible location could be `aReq.session.accessToken` Applies to OpenUserJS#1705 Post OpenUserJS#889 OpenUserJS#564
Martii
added
migration
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
aTokento which is actuallyaAccessTokenin dep README's. Possible location could beaReq.session.accessTokenApplies to GitHub API Deprecations (repoManager and GH import pending failure) #1705Post #889 #564