https://openevalproject.com/ is great, and the associated paper really interesting. But the website should say at least a little of who you are, how to reach out, where to make suggestions. In contrast to the paper it would probably also be useful to add more metadata directly to the specific claims, like the precise model version used for extraction (I assume that will change over time, and wont be fixed to Sonnet 4.5).
https://openevalproject.com/ is great, and the associated paper really interesting. But the website should say at least a little of who you are, how to reach out, where to make suggestions. In contrast to the paper it would probably also be useful to add more metadata directly to the specific claims, like the precise model version used for extraction (I assume that will change over time, and wont be fixed to Sonnet 4.5).