Hello, the work that has been done on this project and the DebateSum paper are really amazing, and we would like to build on it over at Arguflow!
In a lot more detail, I explain what Vault is and our intentions for it in this blog post. But a TLDR is below.
Arguflow vault is a website that allows users to create, query, and rate embeddings that consist of a link and arbitrary text content.
Some of the key features are
- semantic search
- duplication prevention
- ability to upvote/downvote
- ability to view users' and cards' cumulative ratings
Integration Plan
We would like to create embeddings for the data that you currently have and add it to Vault's db such that it can be searched and rated. As a part of that, we will have to work out a plan for appropriate accreditation of the included evidence.
If it's not possible to get the data from the API directly, we would then like to use the scraper you have built to pull it out of the open-evidence project briefs.
Questions
- How can we get access to the data? Currently the API seems to be down as far as we could tell from looking at the network requests made on debate.cards.
- Does the data include the source URL's for the cards? Looking at the prisma schema, it didn't seem like it
Contact info
I should respond to any replies here on Github fairly quickly. Additionally, I would love to meet to talk about things more generally and have a cal.com meeting link here .
Hello, the work that has been done on this project and the DebateSum paper are really amazing, and we would like to build on it over at Arguflow!
Integration with Arguflow Vault
In a lot more detail, I explain what Vault is and our intentions for it in this blog post. But a TLDR is below.
Arguflow vault is a website that allows users to create, query, and rate embeddings that consist of a link and arbitrary text content.
Some of the key features are
Integration Plan
We would like to create embeddings for the data that you currently have and add it to Vault's db such that it can be searched and rated. As a part of that, we will have to work out a plan for appropriate accreditation of the included evidence.
If it's not possible to get the data from the API directly, we would then like to use the scraper you have built to pull it out of the open-evidence project briefs.
Questions
Contact info
I should respond to any replies here on Github fairly quickly. Additionally, I would love to meet to talk about things more generally and have a cal.com meeting link here .