Skip to content

Conversation

@brandynlucca
Copy link
Collaborator

This includes a draft of the apportion_abundance document that covers how kriged biomass is reallocated into estimates of abundance, which is not to be confused with apportioning abundance estimates that were, themselves, kriged. A variety of images have been included that can be swapped out for equations.

@leewujung
Copy link
Member

There's some weird missing ")" in the functions that is probably not used -- see https://github.com/OSOceanAcoustics/echopop/actions/runs/8455613434/job/23163503465?pr=216

I think it'll be good to resolve that before we merge this PR so that the main does not get broken.

@leewujung
Copy link
Member

Ok, so I think you branched out after you did the code changes, so the 2 PRs are mingled. I fixed it by removing the 2 testing_* files and fixed the missing ")" just so that this PR is clean.

@leewujung leewujung self-assigned this Apr 14, 2024
@leewujung leewujung marked this pull request as ready for review September 27, 2024 02:27
@leewujung
Copy link
Member

See #218 for indexing!

Copy link
Member

@leewujung leewujung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did a PR to fix the indexing problems and simplified the text in brandynlucca#6.

I also created an issue #279 to reconcile repeated materials and notation differences between the 2 apportioning pages -- I'll take that on once this one is merged.

leewujung and others added 4 commits October 16, 2024 13:42
* fix indexing and simplify description

* hyperlink and text tweak

* small fixes

* fix heading levels, fix indexing in first section

* remove unused images

* fix equation rendering

* fix attention

* change sequence of text and note

* revert eq.4-7 to write out male and female expressions

* tweak back calculation section

* change page name

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Brandyn Lucca <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Brandyn Lucca <[email protected]>
@leewujung
Copy link
Member

Hey @brandynlucca - Why is sphinx.ext.autodoc from this? Seems out of the blue and results into a conflict?

Copy link
Member

@leewujung leewujung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can merge this now. I will submit a PR to add stratum $i$ to the Jolly-Hampton section, add the citation properly, make some symbol and terminology changes, and not the mapping of each variables to the original equations.

@brandynlucca
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hey @brandynlucca - Why is sphinx.ext.autodoc from this? Seems out of the blue and results into a conflict?

To clarify: are you asking why it was added to _config.yml? If so, it was previously commented out in this PR and when trying to build the jupyter-book I ran into an error that informed me that the autodoc extension was missing. I think it may have been previously commented out to try and debug possible extension issues; however, I'm not sure why it is reporting a conflict here.

@leewujung
Copy link
Member

leewujung commented Oct 18, 2024

Apparently I was missing a word in my comment, but I also misread the code, there was a "#" in front of the line, so there was no effect.

Could you pull in main and resolve the conflicts?

Also, on a second thought, could you remove the Jolly-Hampton stuff from this PR and submit it as a separate PR? I am likely not able to work on it until after next Wednesday because of a short-notice presentation that day, but I think we should release without that part of docs.

@brandynlucca
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Also, on a second thought, could you remove the Jolly-Hampton stuff from this PR and submit it as a separate PR? I am likely not able to work on it until after next Wednesday because of a short-notice presentation that day, but I think we should release without that part of docs.

Done! This corresponds to #281 now.

@brandynlucca brandynlucca merged commit 39c8817 into OSOceanAcoustics:main Oct 18, 2024
@leewujung
Copy link
Member

Remember to use "squash and merge" next time!

@brandynlucca brandynlucca deleted the brandynlucca_WIP_kriging_abundance_apportionment_docs branch December 5, 2024 21:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

No open projects
Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Questions concerning back-calculated abundance apportionment

2 participants