Skip to content

add option USE_OPM_COMMON#998

Merged
bska merged 1 commit intoOPM:masterfrom
akva2:add_opm-common_option
Mar 9, 2026
Merged

add option USE_OPM_COMMON#998
bska merged 1 commit intoOPM:masterfrom
akva2:add_opm-common_option

Conversation

@akva2
Copy link
Member

@akva2 akva2 commented Mar 4, 2026

turn it off build without opm-common support.

Downstream of OPM/opm-common#5039

Only lightly coupled to the upstream, can be made independent, but then I have to add some code to add the HAVE_OPM_COMMON define instead of getting it from the target, which has to be removed again, so I opted to just do it as a downstream.

Closes #401.

@akva2 akva2 added the manual:irrelevant This PR is a minor fix and should not appear in the manual label Mar 4, 2026
@akva2 akva2 force-pushed the add_opm-common_option branch from 2b19220 to 495cd0b Compare March 4, 2026 09:40
Copy link
Member

@bska bska left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Save for one small detail, and for which I may be missing some context, this looks good to me. Provided we're doing this change at all, the changes here are fine.

@akva2 akva2 force-pushed the add_opm-common_option branch from 495cd0b to a0003f3 Compare March 4, 2026 11:53
@blattms
Copy link
Member

blattms commented Mar 4, 2026

I am a bit confused. What exactly is the use case for this and benefit of it?

@akva2
Copy link
Member Author

akva2 commented Mar 5, 2026

It's all rationalized and contextualized in the upstream.

turn it off build without opm-common
@akva2 akva2 force-pushed the add_opm-common_option branch from a0003f3 to 5378be3 Compare March 9, 2026 17:07
Copy link
Member

@bska bska left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Much appreciated. I'll merge into master.

@bska bska merged commit 6d86a9b into OPM:master Mar 9, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

manual:irrelevant This PR is a minor fix and should not appear in the manual

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants